For the NIMBYs (Not-in-my-backyarder's), development of anything in our rural area (except their own properties, restaurants, golf courses, homes, travel lodges, commercial shopping centers, bocchi ball courts, roads, safer and faster highways, utilities, oil and gas wells, utility overhead power lines, fences, lots and lots of fences and gates, ponds and reservoirs, hotels, B & B's and "Churches-already-built-in-the-wine-country-and-rural-areas-that-we-will-pretend-do-not-already-exist" all within our defined "wine country") are hypocritically viewed as acceptable while "new" churches are wondrously labeled a disturbance of the force, a cancer of an alternative reality NIMBY s “know” must be rejected because after 125+ years, suddenly everything is spontaneously "too fragile."
There is no objective peer reviewed science supporting the NIMBY's political statements. You accept their fear mongering and political positions without peer review and sit smugly in the belief you hold truth in your hands.
I'm a Realtor working in this area. I owe no business obligations to anyone regarding this matter even as I have sold properties in this region. I build this site from a source of my own spiritual awakening. I accept the conflicts perceived.
Sometimes while showing property in the country I tell people this is a new winery (directly above), which it is of course. For some reason they seem never to be impressed more than to say, "How nice," as though this beautiful structure is after all, only expected. Ho-hum.
However, when I tell them instead it's a "new church" they always say, "Oh nice!" or "Wow, what demonination?" and are always impressed. Then I have to explain it's really a winery and in the final analysis it's all a matter of perception as there is no real significant difference in the traffic, noise, safety, mind-set, activities, and people loadings in the area, regardless of its use -- winery or church. They reflect on the comments and seem to nod in agreement.
Against all tradition locally, nationally, and internationally, the local wine group says churches must not go in this area because this area is too fragile; yet when people think it's a new church they are looking at, they act impressed and want to know the demonination. Part of what people seek in any area set aside for "tourism" is a rich experience of the "new" in hoping to find truth and meaning.
That suggests to me the story line about "churches shouldn't go here" is composed by NIMBY's and not based on what the public really believes or feels or even seeks in the experience of the Wine Country. Churches have traditionally been allowed in our rural areas (as this site hopes to depict) and probably in this area especially, churches should be tasked to be beautiful, matching high quality structures or better, safe, and quiet as conditions for building. 4/5 of the world population consider themselves "religious." Wine tour guides market the tourism experience of the wine country not in business terms of hard dollars and sense, or number of sunny days per year, or micro-climate characteristics of some 84-micro climates suitable for grapes, they instead market the area in the etherial terms of a religious-spiritual experience as depicted for example even in the marketing materials.
Listen to above broadcasts and decide for yourself. As other structures of interest come to our attention we will post them on this page.
Few remember it was the church that kept the wine country alive in Livermore during prohibition from 1920 to 1933
Spiritual Meaning of Vine, Vineyard, Figs (hit return button and please come back)





















